Typical Approach
Virtually all aspiring filmmakers and
film school grads want to make a feature film. One of the first things they
do is try to raise financing. As you may know, it is a difficult task. Some
of these budding filmmakers actually achieve it. The money comes from a variety of sources: friends, relatives,
businessmen, or an "angel" venture capitalist. After the film is
completed, they take it on the festival circuit and then secure
distribution for theatrical/DVD release.
This is the typical route a novice
filmmaker takes. Seems reasonable, right?
Wrong. There is an inherent problem with
this approach that will doom the film to failure. Read the above approach
over again and try to find the problem.
The problem with this approach is that it
is backwards. Securing distribution should be the first step, not the
last.
|
Securing distribution is the first step in making a feature film, not the last. |
Crucial Link
You may be asking yourself, "What does distribution
have to do with financing?" The answer is everything!
There is a crucial link between
distributing and financing a film. Specifically, the distribution deal is
how you raise capital. By pre-selling distribution rights, you can raise anywhere from seed money to virtually the entire budget.
These rights include:
-
Domestic theatrical
-
International theatrical
-
DVD
-
TV
-
Syndication
Pre-selling distribution rights is how all the real players in the industry
get their projects off the ground.
Recall the countless Cinderella stories
about how a project was pitch to everyone in Hollywood before it was finally
picked up, launching so-and-so's career. Well, they used exactly the
approach recommended here.
Do you think that an unknown Sylvester Stallone made
Rocky with
his own money? Or that Mark Burnett used his
personal savings to produce the first season of
Survivor?
Of course not. They went around Tinseltown pitching the idea until someone
bought it.

Mark Burnett's Brainchild
The person or company that buys the
distribution rights to a project may not be a distributor per se, but can guarantee
distribution by virtue of a prearranged deal with a distributor. It boils
down to the same thing.
Also, the various
rights can be sold to different parties. That is why you often see many
companies listed in credits of a film, depending on the complexity of the
deals involved.
First Step
In film school, there is an old saying
that you should use "OPM" (other people's money) to make your movie.
So the first thing newly minted filmmakers do when they graduate is run out
to "find financing." Big deal. So you make a film using OPM. What is the
point if you cannot get it in front of an audience?
The truth is with today's affordable broadcast
quality equipment, anyone can make a film. I am not saying that it is easy,
but rather, that it is only half the
battle. The other half is distribution, and it should come first, before
spending time and money on anything else.
|
Completing the film is only half the battle (the second half). |
In the development stage, all your effort
must be geared to securing a distributor. This is accomplished by putting
together a viable
package (script, talent, production team) and
pitching it to
parties interested in buying the distribution rights. This is what successful producers spend most of their time
doing.
Look at it this way. You
must find a distributor eventually, so why not do it the way the pros do--before the movie
is made. By doing it correctly, you will waste less time and radically
increase your chances of success.
Additional Benefits
Not only will this approach help finance
the film, but there are additional benefits as well:
-
The distributor has a vested interest
your project and will make every effort to see that it turns a profit.
-
Distributors know what audiences are
looking for at any given time and can help you develop the project in
terms of story choice and actors.
-
Sale of distribution rights imparts
credibility to the project and can help secure additional financing if
needed.
Festival Route, Poor
Odds
Winning a major film festival is the only thing that can save a film
without a distribution deal. This is more
difficult than it sounds. Festivals are supremely political and only
consider a narrow range of genres. Generally, films that win festivals contain a blend of comedy, drama, and
political/social relevance. If you like horror, westerns, or cop movies, forget
about it.
It is virtually impossible to get into a
major film festival, let alone win one. It is like hitting the lottery, without
exaggeration. Spike Lee hit the Cannes Film Festival jackpot with
She's Gotta Have
It. The same for Steven Soderbergh with
Sex, Lies, and
Videotape. Yes, they are talented filmmakers, and yes, the movies
are excellent. Still, these fellows were very very lucky. Without those wins, Spike Lee and Steven Soderbergh
would probably not be where they are today.
The road
to Cannes and Sundance is littered with films that did not win. I have seen too many filmmakers (friends
and graduates) fail in their quest to win a major festival. They never found
distribution and their movies died a quiet death. These talented filmmakers
never received dividends on the "blood, sweat, and tears" they invested, not
to mention the years and money spent. Successful producers do not make movies
without distribution in place.
Financial Suicide and
Other Woes
Is the remote chance of winning a festival
worth gambling your career and life savings on (even OPM)? I think not. In fact,
it is financial suicide to make a film without distribution in place. If
you have spare time and equipment, and want to make a film for fun, be
my guest. However, if you are serious about making a feature, do not use
savings, home equity, or credit cards, especially if you have no guaranteed
distribution. Film hopefuls often risk their family assets and later regret
it.
If this is not enough to convince you,
consider this. When you make a film without distribution in place, you are
putting yourself at a disadvantage when it comes to negotiating with a
prospective distributor. They know you are between a rock and a hard
place, and will squeeze the best deal out of you they can.
Another problem is that when you make a
deal with a distributor who does not have a vested interest in the project,
you are at their mercy in terms of the priority the give your project. If they are
distributing a similar film, they may push that movie first if they are
inclined to. Worst case scenario, your film winds up on a shelf until the
distribution contract expires. This may take years and there nothing you can
do about it.
There are techniques for negotiating
a good
distribution deal for a finished film, but it is best not to get
into this jam in the first place. An
El
Mariachi only comes along once in a generation. Again, successful producers do not make movies
without distribution in place. Have I convinced you yet?
Rejection
As simple as this approach to financing is,
it is difficult to do it successfully. The reason is because so much of the
entertainment business is subject to personal tastes.
Simon
Cowell is one of the wealthiest personalities in the music business
thanks to lucrative
American Idol deals with Fox Broadcasting and Sony BMG. However, his
first effort to sell the show was a failure. All the major network's passed
on it. Rupert Murdoch did not like the
idea and rejected it for Fox. His daughter, who happened to be at the pitch,
liked the show and talked her father into picking it up.
The moral of the story? Assuming that you
have a solid pitch and package, rejection is not a function of the project's
worthiness, but rather, the personal taste of the executive you are pitching
to. That's why it is important to develop a thick skin and be persistent.